Realty funds find it tough to raise money overseas

No Comments »

Real estate funds trying to raise a couple of billion dollars overseas are struggling to tie up commitments, with potential investors put off both by integrity worries over India’s realty sector and still-depressed property markets abroad.

Some half-a-dozen funds have been scouting abroad for about a year to raise between $200 million and $700 million (Rs 900-3,000 crore) each.

This is the second big overseas fund-raising initiative for the sector. In 2006-07, domestic real estate funds got commitments for $8-10 billion, of which about $5 billion made its way to the Indian market.

The foreign money is crucial. India’s real estate sector is poised to expand after a couple of slow years, with developers again taking on large projects, but is held back by a severe fund crunch.

Loans from banks, their biggest source of capital, are tight because of the central bank’s hawkish stance on lending to the sector.

Domestic fund-raising by private equity (PE) firms is on a smaller scale of Rs.50-150 crore.

India opened its real estate sector to foreign direct investment (FDI) in 2005.

“While global investors are themselves relooking at their portfolios, the fact is that they haven’t seen many significant exits in Indian real estate in the past, and returns on investments were not significant,” said Ajit Krishnan, partner, real estate practice, at consultancy Ernst and Young.

“While it will take longer for funds to raise money this time around, we expect to see more exits in the next one year or so, which should boost investor confidence globally,” Krishnan said.

According to property consultancy Knight Frank India, only $400-500 million of foreign funds flowed into the real estate sector in 2009-10.

PE players back on realty turf

No Comments »

With the country’s real estate sector starting to look up post downturn, and equity markets scaling new highs, private equity (PE) firms have begun focusing on the property turf yet again. These days they are cherrypicking home and office space assets only.

Industry estimates suggests India Inc saw over 150 major deals in the first half of 2010. Of this, a little over 10 per cent were in the real estate sector alone. The current period has also seen a distinct rise in domestic real estate private equity funds, vis-a-vis mainly offshore real estate private equity capital in 2006 – early 2008.

Real estate consultancy firm, Jones Lang LaSalle chairman & country head Anuj Puri, said: “The PE firms expect a return of 20-25 per cent post tax — which is nearly the same as what they were before the downturn. The structure, however, has changed as the funds are looking more at capital protection — meaning lower risk even if that means slightly lower returns. Currently, the proportion is heavily skewed towards residential. This can be attributed to the fact that the residential sector is correctly seen as a self-liquidating asset class, while commercial and retail real estate have exit-related concerns due to unavailability of REIT/REMF (real estate mutual fund) vehicles in India.”

Niranjan Hiranandani, managing director of Hiranandani Constructions, seconds his views. He feels the focus is clearly on residential space and not retail and commercial. “Post downturn, the developer’s land bank is not the only criterion being weighed by PE firms for investing. They have begun concentrating on the project, its implementation process as well as on the overall performance of the real estate company and are expecting a return of 15-20 per cent per annum through their realty investments,” adds Hiranandani.

The real estate private equity investment market has become more focused in terms of geographies, asset class preference, deal structures, etc. “Institutional fixed income investments and domestic capital are trends which will emerge stronger going ahead. In short, there are distinct signals of a bottoming out of the investment activity curve and an uptake in activity in 2011,” said Vikram Hosangady, who is executive director of KPMG.

“It first seemed as though a majority of the PE funds were being channelled into the primary cities. However, it emerges that they have also chosen to invest into large residential projects in tier II cities, since they perceive that the demand for residential spaces in those cities is enough to justify quick absorption. In the end, what matters most is returns on investment,” said Manish Aggarwal, executive director, investment services (India), Cushman & Wakefield.

Hosangady feels the PE funds largely continues to focus on the top seven cities.